Archive for the ‘Community’ Category

Intercreativity

Sunday, November 29th, 2009

This originally appeared in http://www.frontlinemedia.org.au/node/5.

I was reminded of “intercreativity” twice today: first, during a talk with a multimedia artist in Darwin about how he could potentially contribute to Frontline; second, when I visited the web site of a Philippine-based artist to listen to her compositions, including excerpts from her sound installation work.

Frontline will have multimedia and sound installations. But how will we make multimedia and sound installations, and other “locative media” in the coming months and years? I believe our locative media should be guided by the principle of intercreativity.

I learned of “intercreativity” from Tim Berners-Lee’s book, Weaving the Web, where he recounts (among other things) why he invented the World Wide Web. He contrasted interactivity with intercreativity on the Web: with interactivity, a Web user is given options (buttons to push, links to click) that are predetermined by the author/producer; with intercreativity, Web users make things together as prosumers (producer-consumers). His original specification for the Web client was thus a browser that was also an editor.

I have long ago taken on intercreativity as a first principle for the work I wish to do on the Web and in my practice as a community artist. The principle of “making things together” seems such an obvious framework for a project such as Frontline.

Reminding myself of intercreativity as first principle and framework is useful in a personal context. I have looked forward to making things myself as a participant in Frontline; I wish to work on sound and multimedia installations in particular. But after listening to the sound installation excerpts (and other compositions) on the web site I visited last night, and on reflecting some more on mmy talk with the Darwin multimedia artist today, I reminded myself that it will not be enough — and possibly not even appropriate — for me to concentrate on making things myself. I should think and work intercreatively and concentrate on making things with others.

Now, there are many ways of “making things together”. It is not enough to have the desire to make things together and to put people together somewhere then ask them to make things together (or “collaborate”); people who want to make things together should discuss and decide on how they will accomplish this; the environment and tools and resources for making things together must also be secured. In this regard, I think I can contribute to fostering intercreativity in Frontline by helping develop the dialogue about how to make things together, and also contribute to developing the environment that will make intercreativity possible.

I should be thinking not only of composing music and designing sound installations. I should think also of composing and designing the environment that will allow people to compose music and design installations together. And I should be thinking of how I compose and design environments collaboratively. I have done similar things in my previous work with the Theatre of the Oppressed and Cultural Action (in a previous life) in the 1980s and early 1990s. My challenge is to explore how to do so with locative media, how to be intercreative with Frontline.

intercreate growing pains

Saturday, March 9th, 2002

from bramilo.weblogs.com

intecreate.net screenshot

Its been two months since I launched intercreate.net. There are twenty members so far, and a few postings. It has been, therefore, quiet. Cath Styles from Adult Learning Australia, the most active member thus far, has asked why it has been quiet and what could be done to liven it up a bit.

Some of Cath’s questions:

“Maybe there’s not a critical mass of people in Australia who will use it? … Do you think people are intimidated? … Is its purpose as clear as it could be?”

I had replied to Cath that while sites take up to six months to pick up, I would like more traffic at intercreate. I suggested that more activity on it can be encourage by initiating some projects (such as a newspoetry forum) and by promoting it a bit more. With focused activity and a bit of marketing, we may get a few more members, and more activity happening.

I also raised other possible issues:

“I don’t expect too many members or too much interest, however, as I think the CCD field may still be grappling with the relevance and usefulness of internet technologies to its work. I know this from my direct experience in advocating the use of internet tools — and actually setting up these tools — among community arts practitioners and organisations (and other organisations) in Darwin and elsewhere.

“There is still much resistance from the CCD/community arts people up here to adopting new technologies, because it appears to add more work, or its not obviously useful to ongoing work (particularly to work up here which is so performance and production centred). It is also hard sometimes to convince people that internet technologies can actually assist work, if work routines are adjusted to accommodate advantages provided by new technologies. There are thus cultural as well as technical barriers (e.g. attitude to adopting and maximising new technologies), and these barriers are more difficult to overcome than technical ones.

“Maybe it is simply that target users for the site are just too busy doing many other things (including participating in dozens of mailing lists, or web sites, etc.).”

Cath’s response was:

Re. the critical mass question. Seems like there are plenty of people who might potentially use Intercreate who currently spend a lot of time using overseas-based news and discussion facilities, and who might ultimately prefer and benefit from participating in something closer to home. It must partly be a question, as you say, of promoting it as a useful tool.

She also agreed that initiating projects will help liven up intercreate.

So, some of the things I intend to do to help grow intercreate a bit more quickly are:

* redesigning the default theme (look and feel) so its cleaner and meaner;
* initiating some online projects;
* repromoting the site to ccd practitioners; and,
* getting more direct feedback from critical users.

Cath’s feedback and suggestions have been invaluable. I hope to get more feedback from her and eventually from other users.

As for the other issues that concern me, particularly cultural barriers to maximising new technologies, I need to do more research and work on that.

ccd.net launch

Saturday, March 9th, 2002

from bramilo.weblogs.com
Posted by Christian Ramilo, 3/9/02 at 9:39:36 AM.

Bong at ccd.net launch
Bong at ccd.net launch

The national community cultural development web site, ccd.net, was launched on 4 March 2002 at the Ngapartji Theatre, Adelaide. I attended the launch virtually, using Netmeeting. I had suggested to the content subcommittee and steering committee (both of which I sit on) that the launch be webcast and that more people attend it virtually but due to various technical and other limitations, it was decided that a bigger virtual launch be organised later.

I was able to see the proceedings from Darwin but had trouble hearing the formal parts of the launch as the mic level at the Ngapartji end was too low for that part of the launch. After the speeches, however, I chatted with people who were at the launch. The sound from Adelaide improved a lot as the speakers were fairly near to the computer. I had, however, problems transmitting good sound — I was using a plain 56K dial-up connection — due probably to net congestion; my video was good, on the other hand. So I had a number of chats with me typing in my stuff and people at the other end typing and/or speaking. The transcript of the text chat is below.

The chats, and my image on Netmeeting was — unknown to me for the most part of my session — being projected on the big screen at Ngapartji. Had I known, I probably would have been more prudent in some of my responses (but then again, probably not).

As a “gimmick” (as Julia Tymukas and I described my part in the launch), I think it went reasonably well. At the minimum proved that we can try a virtual launch later on using Netmeeting (or a similar technology such as iVisit that will allow Mac users to participate too). More important, the “gimmick” may have demonstrated that videoconferencing can be used by ccd organisations and practitioners relatively easily for general purposes — maybe videoconferencing can complement teleconferencing later on, saving community arts networks and practitioners some money.

==================================

Transcript of Chat at ccd.net launch

Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:06:13 PM Hello all.
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:06:26 PM welcome to (virtual) adelaide bong
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:06:32 PM thank you
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:06:58 PM you need to talk closer to the mic, please
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:07:24 PM of course
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:07:43 PM hang around bong - will swith back to you soon
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:07:58 PM okay. will hang around. bring the mic level up, please
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:10:20 PM how’s my audio?
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:10:41 PM breaking up qauite a bit
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:11:06 PM is that any better?
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:11:32 PM getting lots of feedback
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:11:44 PM okay. will stick to chat for now
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:12:04 PM i’ll se who i can send over to chat
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:12:13 PM okay
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:12:27 PM your video is paused, i think
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:15:59 PM hi Bong its BB here
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:16:10 PM hello BB, can’t see you
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:16:42 PM I turn off th evid, mhh a bit not good in front of camera :-)
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:17:08 PM i’m not too good in front of a camera either
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:17:30 PM nice crowd you have there
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:17:37 PM Well, many people here and they’re so ecited to see you on the screen
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:17:59 PM thanks. there are, however, more exciting things to see on screen
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:18:26 PM yeah right. This is quite awesome isn’t it?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:18:51 PM yes, it is. a lot of hard work was put into it.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:19:34 PM BB, you can talk if you want. i can hear audio from there
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:19:38 PM I just talk to Mark , Lockie is here he like to say hello to you
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:19:47 PM okay. hello Lockie
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:19:52 PM Hi Bong
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:20:04 PM maybe that camera should be pointed at you
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:20:24 PM Have been living in Murray Bridge for the last five weeks working on a show. Same old same old.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:20:35 PM hello dee
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:20:44 PM De Martin has just rocked up.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:20:49 PM i can even hear your nice laugh
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:21:02 PM Great stuff mate.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:21:08 PM get lockie beside you so i can see him too, please
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:21:26 PM good looking bloke that one
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:21:49 PM my audio is a bit patchy as i’m using a normal phone line
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:21:59 PM you mob are using high tech shit over there
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:22:18 PM Right so have these mob here got an isd line or what.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:22:35 PM they have a 1M line, on isdn i think
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:22:44 PM Right
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:22:50 PM us poor ccd sods can’t afford that (yet)
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:22:59 PM Seems odd this stuff but great to see you.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:23:18 PM good to see you to. are you going to the albury wodonga conference?
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:24:11 PM Maybe, I don’t have much idea what I will be doing then. I might be in Katherine mid year if so I will get up to Darwin
for a live chat.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:24:25 PM yes, that will be good. maybe we can even fish
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:24:50 PM Nothing like a good fish killing workshop.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:24:57 PM i’m inot that
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:25:02 PM hello, baby
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:25:09 PM Oops I’ve lost weight,
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:25:33 PM what’s a nice baby doing witha bunch of community arts types?
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:25:44 PM Great to see the facials while we chat.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:26:11 PM yes. at some other times in the day, audio is better — less people/traffic on the net
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:26:28 PM Interesting!
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:26:38 PM but hey, this is cheap — just the normal rates you pay for internet access
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:26:39 PM Bong I will head off now.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:26:55 PM okay, lockie,. will see you up here when you get here
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:27:23 PM I would howver like to find out more about this stuff so will email when I get back to Albany, Cheers Mate.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:27:37 PM no probs. ciao. take care
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:30:33 PM Hi bong it’s andy here
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:30:37 PM hello andy
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:30:48 PM How’s things up there?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:30:58 PM had my video paused for a smoke. its raining up here
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:31:15 PM Sun is shining and the launch has gone very well
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:31:32 PM yes, as i saw. are you happy, jan?
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:31:48 PM yes, it’s looking good
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:32:07 PM i was browsing the site while the speeches were happening — trying ot follow the tour
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:32:26 PM i’ve registered already, by the way
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:32:26 PM and did you get the tour?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:32:49 PM sort of — audio was a bit faint while the speeaches were on but caught some of julia’s stuff
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:32:55 PM hey can you see me?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:33:17 PM yes, i can see you (with the sunglasses on your head — too sunny is it?)
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:33:36 PM no, I just don’t want to lose them!
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:33:54 PM you can wear them and pretend to be an ASIO type
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:34:14 PM have you got a beer up there? I could send the caterers up
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:34:31 PM yes, please — except send cartons of coke or tequilla instead
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:34:42 PM i have the lime ready
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:34:43 PM I’ll do my best
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:34:51 PM waiting …
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:35:05 PM okay, speaking of beer, I think I’d better get one myself!
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:35:25 PM okay. see you later. are you at the art of dissent thing too?
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:35:46 PM no, I’m going back on Thursday morn. Hope it all goes well
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:36:03 PM hope so too. see yopu at some stage anyway. ciao
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:36:23 PM cheers, thanks for everything on this project. I’ve enjoyed working with you
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:36:38 PM me too. more work to come i’m sure
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:37:37 PM hello
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:37:51 PM hello bong, Neal price from Brisbane -friend of ferals
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:38:08 PM hi, neal. how are the ferals and brisbane?
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:38:43 PM Sara and norm are coming in to Adelaide on Thursday I think. Its nice to meet you, how is the fellowship going.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:39:03 PM you can talk, by the way — i can get sound from there okay, i just a problem sending sound.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:39:24 PM yes, i can, clearly
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:39:53 PM not much fun, having that at a launch
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:40:02 PM The guy is ok
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:40:08 PM that’s good.
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:40:37 PM in not very good at technology.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:40:53 PM who is? too much to learn these days
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:40:57 PM okay, bye neal
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:41:39 PM yes
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:41:51 PM hi
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:42:11 PM you can talk, by the way — i can get sound from there okay, i just a problem sending sound.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:43:09 PM i can hear you clearly
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:43:16 PM i’m not send sound anyway
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:43:35 PM yes, i can see you — no need to speak too close to the mic
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:43:57 PM raining today. how’s alice?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:44:16 PM flies everywhere?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:44:49 PM haven’t been there in ages
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:44:55 PM must visit sometime
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:45:21 PM what new government? just joking …
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:45:37 PM we should talk about this soemtime
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:45:54 PM still a lot ofproblems with arts and culture, even with clare atthe helm
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:46:39 PM they’ve had the 100 days honeymoon, what next?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:47:06 PM i shouldn’t talk this way as I’m an ALP member — i’m trying ot get info to them through various channel
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:47:27 PM maybe in another 100 days things will move
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:47:53 PM too slow for me but i’m really just an impatient anarchist
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:48:23 PM maybe …
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:48:32 PM i’ll ask them one of these days
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:48:41 PM i’ll send the question in morse code
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:48:51 PM … — … —
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:49:22 PM nice seeing you again. we’ll catch up when back in the territory or over the phone or email. ciao
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:50:51 PM it’s john harvey, from ccdb.can i talk with you through the mic??can i listen to your response, with headphones
somewhere.can ….. ;….. ——.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:50:53 PM hello. you can talk — i can get sound from there okay, i just have a problem sending sound.
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:51:01 PM Hi Bong this is Jane
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:51:02 PM how are you jane?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:51:08 PM yes, i can see you
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:51:11 PM yes
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:51:18 PM yes i can hear you
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:51:23 PM i’m not send sound
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:51:36 PM nice milestone
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:51:47 PM relax now
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:51:56 PM i saw a lot but didn’t hear too many things
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:52:03 PM problem with the mic level there
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:52:10 PM no didn’t hear any speeches
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:52:28 PM hope they put their $ where his mouth is
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:52:47 PM yes, i was browsing it while julia was talking
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:53:07 PM always, always. never ends. yes, a good start
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:53:16 PM web sites never get done
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:53:54 PM yes, that’s how it should be. otherwise, why have a dynamic site?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:54:02 PM sorry my fingers aren;t as quick as they were
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:54:20 PM okay, will see you thursday or friday maybe when i’m there
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:54:34 PM yes, for art of dissent (to express my dissent)
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:54:51 PM bye
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:57:14 PM yes
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:57:25 PM hello
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:57:32 PM i think so
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:57:36 PM Im weare you awake
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:57:50 PM how are you?
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:57:54 PM is ben strout
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:58:05 PM yes, ben i recognise you even thourgh the haze of cyberspace
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:58:10 PM didn’
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:58:13 PM sorry
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:58:19 PM didn’t know the camera worked
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:58:27 PM you can talk, by the way — i can get sound from there okay, i just have a problem sending sound.
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:58:46 PM oh I see. I asked “are you awake” got no answer so I thought TYPE
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:58:57 PM yes i can hear you clearly
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:59:07 PM busy busy busy
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:59:10 PM hw’s things? waht
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:59:29 PM with too many projects (ccd fellowship stuff) and raising a 7-month old baby
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 6:59:38 PM the sevn month that’s great
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 6:59:53 PM greta, sometimes … he’s a handful
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:00:11 PM I saw a little baby on the plane …. my two are 15 and 12 , so it’s been a long time
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:00:17 PM lucky you
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:00:28 PM trouble coming up with the teenage years
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:00:34 PM lucky I am taking my daughter to Nick Cave… lucky is right
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:00:44 PM nick cave is fine
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:00:47 PM you bet
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:01:08 PM she’s into new music … pretty good. and into art / some drama
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:01:16 PM can’t stop her
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:01:34 PM like all sensible kids should be. my daughter (she’s 7) is into singing, ballet and swimming
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:01:42 PM full time taxi driving for me, though
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:01:47 PM really
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:01:52 PM can’t wait for her to get her P plates
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:01:59 PM absolytely.
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:02:04 PM there goes the weekend
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:02:09 PM what weekend?
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:02:15 PM her weekend, not yours
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:02:30 PM yes. father must have its merits, though. i need toi find out
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:02:45 PM sorry, meant fatherhood
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:02:48 PM you have the new baby…. that will be great
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:03:00 PM yes. can;t wait for him to get his P plates too
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:03:04 PM just joking
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:03:26 PM When my wife was in Korea, we did MSN … you can just hang on with it, can’t you?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:03:50 PM sorry, hang on meaning keep using it?
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:04:06 PM sorry.. yes. “hang on” like keep the conversation (and relationship) going.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:04:26 PM yes. msn is okay. it can do videochats too, i believe
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:04:38 PM I didn’t have the video. would have helped!!
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:04:47 PM yes, but is she in korea still?
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:05:01 PM No. Home. Away most of last year, but home now. Very good
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:05:17 PM yes, very good. long distance relationships are hard
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:05:38 PM tried it for a few weeks and gave up — ran back to the missus
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:05:38 PM I just realised this conversation is on a big screen here in Adelaide….. Olympics of MSN
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:05:55 PM sorry, didn;t know that. i should quit now, i think
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:06:02 PM Me too before I weep.
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:06:05 PM Good to see you
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:06:15 PM no weeping allowed. enough beer there to cheer you up i gather
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:06:34 PM I’m going with T Crea and Whitney now…. try the local beer.
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:06:37 PM see you, Bong
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:06:46 PM andy donovan was going ot send me some tequilla via the caterers. i’ll drink to you when it gets here
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:06:54 PM ciao
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:06:55 PM do that!
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:06:59 PM ciap
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:07:03 PM ciao
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:07:07 PM bye
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:07:37 PM hello
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:07:39 PM hi bong its bev
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:07:44 PM hi, bev
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:07:50 PM you can talk, by the way — i can get sound from there okay, i just have a problem sending sound.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:08:11 PM i can hear you so no need ot type
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:08:26 PM well, just because you can
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:08:39 PM save the hands — fight RSI
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:09:00 PM well you can type while you talk if you want
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:09:19 PM still humid, and raining today
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:09:37 PM no, you don’t. i still hate it
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:09:45 PM yes i can hear the noise
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:09:58 PM julia, the noisy lithuanian?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:10:02 PM yes, relax now
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:10:15 PM chickens?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:10:34 PM i must take a photo when i see her on thursday
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:10:46 PM yes, for the art of dissent stuff
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:11:41 PM the art of wellbeing seems more productive than art of dissent — you can get sick of dissenting too much.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:11:51 PM well, there’s wank everywhere
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:13:37 PM don’t know scott but that approach is a worry. good luck with digesting all that.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:13:58 PM great. let us dissent together
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:14:25 PM well, time for me to say bye too.
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:14:36 PM okay
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:15:21 PM Darling its me
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:15:23 PM hello rainbow hair
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:15:30 PM yes i can hear you
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:15:36 PM you can talk, by the way — i can get sound from there okay, i just have a problem sending sound.
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:15:41 PM I think it is time to sign off
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:15:48 PM the night has gone really well
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:15:52 PM yes, it is. thanks for that. will see you thursday night
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:15:56 PM It was great having you as a gimmic
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:16:07 PM How did you feel being a gimmic?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:16:10 PM i’ll put that in my resume (”gimmick”)
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:16:20 PM i liked being a gimmic
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:16:29 PM your turn next time
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:16:35 PM I will work wonders with the next fellowship geek gimick
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:16:39 PM we’ll beam you to other continents
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:16:58 PM i have a few geek gimmicks up my sleeve
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:17:04 PM But seriously how did it go did you get a sense of the night
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:18:08 PM are you capturing me?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:18:21 PM i’ve been captured too many times (on screen and of)
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:18:36 PM coming to where?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:18:52 PM roger that
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:19:29 PM geeky anough?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:19:33 PM enough?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:19:53 PM what are you doing?
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:20:22 PM i will try to be irreverent
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:20:48 PM email me the drinks, pelase
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:21:00 PM have a coke or a tequilla for me
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:21:02 PM What is the mix
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:21:12 PM tequilla, straight ahead
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:21:27 PM That is exactly what Mark thought
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:21:35 PM yes. but it must be Cuervo
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:21:49 PM yes, only Cuervo
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:21:55 PM snon snob snob
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:21:58 PM snob
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:22:02 PM Mark wants to know does it have the worm
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:22:08 PM we don’t have it up here
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:22:15 PM Tragic
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:22:22 PM no worms; just the usual poison
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:22:22 PM My love we are being kicked out
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:22:29 PM have fun being kicked out
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:22:33 PM will see you soon
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:22:37 PM Thanks for making this event very geek like
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:22:45 PM Love you and signing off for now
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:22:47 PM no probs.
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:22:54 PM Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:22:56 PM bye
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:23:18 PM bye
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:23:33 PM see you soon mark
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:24:07 PM no, sory
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:24:16 PM hello cath’
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:24:30 PM thanks bong - see you soonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:24:30 PM bye
Ngapartji Theatre 3/4/2002 7:24:39 PM singing off………..
Bong Ramilo 3/4/2002 7:24:43 PM ok

Intercreate.net

Sunday, January 13th, 2002

from bramilo.weblogs.com

I launched Intercreate (http://www.intercreate.net) on 10 January 2002.

Intercreate is a web portal about community cultural development and new technologies. It provides spaces and facilities for online sharing of information, discussion of issues, and for hosting online CCD events. Intercreate hopes to assist artists, technologists, and others interested in community cultural development to make things and solve problems together online.

As specified in my Fellowship plan, a “community arts portal will be set up as a venue to explore and foster CCD online, particularly through facilitating the sharing of information and discussion of issues related to CCD and new technologies, and through hosting online CCD events. Intercreate is that community arts portal.

The portal is basic and does not have much content at the moment. I announced the setting up of Intercreate on several mailing lists (including ccd_debate, ccd_interns, o18) and emailed some contacts, inviting contirbutions. Intercreate, I explained, is a community-driven site and as such depends on content input from users.

I’m hoping many users sign up and use the space, although I am not expecting this to happen in a month or two.

Intercreate also seeks to complement the National CCD Web Site, www.ccd.net. That site, scheduled for launching in March 2002, has broader coverage of CCD matters while Intercreate focuses on the CCD and new technologies issues. To maintain the complementation between the two sites, Intercreate will seek to focus on its own areas of interest through the selection of topics and activities it hosts and facilitates; broader CCD matters will be referred to www.ccd.net.

I’m a member of the Steering Committee of the National CCD Web Site. The development of Intercreate was informed by discussions about the nature of the National CCD Web Site. The Steering Committee is aware of the plan to set up Intercreate and lines of communication are open for coordination between the two sites.

For more information on Intercreate, visit www.intercreate.net.

CCD and Open Source

Thursday, October 25th, 2001

from bramilo.weblogs.com

In discussions about the development of a national CCD web site, I’ve advocated for using open source software as the preferred development platform. There are several reasons why I believe open source is the appropriate model for developing a CCD web site, including cost-effectivity — open source software is usually free.

The main reason I advocate open source, however, is that I recognise an affinity between the philosophies — and some practices — between CCD and the open source movement. The following quotation provides a good explanation of what open source is; while it talks about Linux (which is probably the premiere open source “killer application”), it applies broadly to the open source movement:

Linux has evolved, and continues to evolve, under the open source philosophy of the free sharing of ideas. If not for this massive, shared, open community environment, Linux — and much of the open source software that runs the Internet — wouldn’t be here. It’s a testament to this community and its philosophy that the creation of a powerful operating system such as Linux could have come about through the interaction and cooperation of thousands of people worldwide.

Linux is a symbol of what’s possible when we work together as a whole, sharing each other’s ideas and building upon each other’s work. It’s built by everybody, for everybody, and it’s free.

The quintessential guide to working within an open source project … is Eric S. Raymond’s “The Cathedral and the Bazaar.” It is available both as a hardcover book and free online from www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar .

- from “The Advanced Linux Pocketbook,” edited by Ashton Mills, published by ACP Tech, Sydney, 2001.

The significance of open source to CCD goes beyond the building of the national CCD web site. Open source software has been used by many community-based organisations (as well as government and commercial organisations) over the years. Many open source applications perform as well, if not better, than proprietary and non-free applications — community-based organisations or movements (like CCD) can obviously benefit from using free and stable applications.

Using free applications also increases the chance of getting more individuals and communities online/switched on cheaply and legally — like it or not, software piracy is rampant in all sectors, and as much open source software is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GNU GPL) scheme, users need not use pirated or expensive commercial applications. Under the GNU GPL scheme, apllications can be freely installed and distributed (with some conditions). More information on the GNU GPL is at www.gnu.org .

There is also the benefit of world-wide, community-driven support for open source software. Many of these applications where developed collaboratively by programmers, testers, documentors, and other supporters, sometimes involving dozens (or thousands, in the case of Linux) of volunteers working to solve problems and improve performance. There is, therefore, wider support from developers for many popular applications, often at no cost to users.

Using open source software, or being part of the open source movement, is a crucial way of contributing to the bridging of the “Digital Divide,” of democratising new technologies. For an excellent article on the Digital Divide, see Bridging the Organizational Divide: Toward a Comprehensive Approach to the Digital Divide, PolicyLink, September 2001 and other articles at Policy Link: Digital Divide (many thanks to Gareth Wreford at Australia Council for putting me onto this mob).

There are more advantages to open source that I’ll discuss in a future article. There are also, of course, like with anything else, disadvantages to using open source software and I will discuss those too in a future article.

Thursday, October 04, 2001

Thursday, October 4th, 2001

from blogger:reinvention

We are at Angela’s right now looking at blogging possibilities.

Thirteen Pentiums

Wednesday, July 4th, 2001

from bramilo.weblogs.com

Thirteen Pentium 100s decommissioned by the Australia Council arrived at Brown’s Mart in Darwin on 14 June 2001. These computers were allocated by Australia Council, through Scott O’Hara and the Community Cultural Development Board, to the Community-based Multimedia Program in Darwin that I’m overseeing as part of my Fellowship.

Current State of the Machines

Not all the Pentiums are functional; Scott said he’d send us a baker’s dozen so we can get about ten working. I’ve done a preliminary check on some of them but I’ll need to check each one to see what needs to be done to get as much of them working as possible. So far, I’ve determined that they came with the wrong keyboards (Scott warned me about this), so we’ll need to get PS/2 to DIN adapters (I’ve tried one and it works). We will probably need adapters for the mice as well. None of them have working operating systems, and none came with floppy drives and CD-ROM drives (which Scott also warned me about).

As at 27 June, I have managed to get one system running under Linux (Red Hat 6). I’ve had to scavenge a floppy drive from a dead Brown’s Mart PC and wire in my own spare CD-ROM drive to install the system but its running. I can do the same (that is, put in the floppy and CD-ROM drives) for each machine that I need to set up. I however plan to look at other distributions (versions) of Linux that I’ve found that supposedly need less RAM and hard drive space — these distributions may be better suited to the Ozco Pentiums than Red Hat 6.

By mid-July I intend to know the exact status of these machines and will know how many are functional from among the baker’s dozen.

Linux

I wasn’t concerned too much about the operating system as I intended to load Linux on them. Linux is more difficult to install and configure than Windows (but not that much harder, I think) but it is free so we won’t have to pay for licenses. Linux is also reputedly more stable than Windows so once it is set up properly, it will need less maintenance than Windows. Linux has graphic user interfaces as well (e.g. KDE and Gnome) and basic applications for Office functions (word processing, spreadsheet, etc.), image manipulation, programming, and Internet access.

As the Pentiums will most likely be used for Internet use, Internet and networking capabilities are important; Linux comes with Netscape and this will be sufficient for email, news reading, and web access. The Linux desktop is different to Windows or Mac ones but I think it won’t take too long for users (even novice ones) to get the basic hang of it; when it comes to Netscape, there’s little difference between the Linux and other versions anyway.

I also liked the idea of using Linux as a way of emphasising the “alternative” nature of my work, which I sometimes refer to as Low End and Feral Technology, or LEFT. Linux is open source, free, supported by millions of volunteers, runs on old machines well — things that Windows is not.

I am still open to the possibility that Linux may be too difficult for many users, especially those that are used to Windows or MacOS through their usage of these popular operating systems at school. If it proves too hard, I may need to ask Microsoft to sponsor licenses.

As for the floppies and CD-ROM drives, I’ll need them mainly to set up the machines — if they Pentiums are to be mainly Internet terminals, they will not really need floppy drives and CD-ROM drives. If users needed to access a floppy or CD-ROM, I can install them on a server and users can access these drives on that server through the network.

Where and How will these Pentiums be used?

The original plan for these Pentiums was to set them up at a venue that was accessible to community artists and members. The computers would be used mainly for basic office and Internet functions. It was also envisioned that the machines can be used in an Internet Cafe setting eventually — the Cafe will be part of the Community-based Multimedia Program and could probably be a component of the social enterprise area of my Fellowship.

I will need to get them running in the next few weeks. An immediate use for the machines — assuming I get them running in time — will be for the Darwin Fringe Festival in August. They will be set up in an Internet Cafe arrangement during selected gigs in Brown’s Mart’s courtyard.

Ken Conway, Brown’s Mart Executive Officer, and I have also requested the use of a space downstairs in Brown’s Mart to set up a pilot multimedia/Internet lab using the machines. The space is still occupied by another tenant but will be vacated soon. The idea is that the Pentiums (or some of them) will be set up in a network, probably with better multimedia-capable PCs, that will be available for use by artists who want to develop community-based multimedia projects. I will be co-maintaining the space while I work on some of my own projects. The space, however, will only be available for about six months so we need to find a longer-term home for the machines/system.

A long-term possibility is to use the machines in a broader program that I am currently organising: the it4cd program. it4cd stands for Information Technology for Community Development; it is a program that will offer Internet and IT access (and training) to unemployed people, specifically youth at risk, in the Darwin region, and which will deploy community-based multimedia strategies for cultural and economic advancement of unemployed young people.

I am still working on the it4cd idea and will promote it to Brown’s Mart Board, Centacare (the Catholic Church’s employment agency), Corrugated Iron Youth Arts, and Octa4 (the ISP I am placed with) as potential founding partners. I’ve broached the broad idea with Mario Trinidad, Centacare CEO, who was very interested — he is open to providing the venue for the computer network; we will be discussing it further when he returns from leave in late July. I’ve suggested the idea to Brown’s Mart Board who have agreed to it. Felino Molina, Octa4 Managing Director, is open to supporting a community Internet access project and we will discuss it more in the coming weeks. I will be talking to Susan Ditter, Executive Officer of Corrugated Iron, soon.

I will post the concept paper on it4cd on this web log as soon as its ready.

Mid-Winter Thinktank

Wednesday, July 4th, 2001

from bramilo.weblogs.com

I did a presentation for the Community Arts Association of South Australia’s Mid-Winter Thinktank on 29 June 2001, 10:30 - 11:00. The Thinktank was held in Adelaide, attended mainly by students of the Graduate Diploma in CCD. I did the presentation from Darwin using Netmeeting 3.

The topic of the forum is “What is Culture? What is a Culture?” I was asked to address the following: community, identity and culture in virtual communities. How do virtual communities represent themselves culturally. What is the impact of technologies on communities cultural identities?

My session started out as a text chat to demonstrate how online (synchronous) communication usually is (on IRC and other chat facilities). Then they showed my Powerpoint show (with Mark clicking the slides). After the text and the slides, I revealed my face and Julia Tymukas, who was chairing the session, made the point about starting with text first to show the big difference with having a face via video. I added that with text they would know less about me than with video, etc.

Bong
Screenshot by Mark Tranthim-Fryer

Questions raised and my responses

How can artists’ work be protected online? I mentioned that the Moral Rights legislation was recently passed and that the Department of Communication, Information Technology and the Arts (DCITA) had a lot of information on intellectual property and that they would be the best source of information on these matters.

How do we do CCD online? What arts activities or projects are possible? I said that I’ve been thinking and worrying about this as well, and that I have small projects or experiments regarding this question. I mentioned Darwin News as an example: Darwin News is an email list I run that’s based on the concept of news poetry (inspired by the mailing list of the same name out of Urbana, Illinois, USA). With Darwin News, Darwin poets (or citizen-poets) are invited to post poems about everyday things in Darwin, and discussion or debate is invited but all postings need to be in poetic form.

Are new technologies really socially beneficial? The inquirer pointed out that new technologies create social problems too, as with young people who spend too much time on the Net. I said that new technologies do bring problems but it also brings benefits; we need to determine how new technologies can be useful for us, especially as “shit happens online too” (as I typed on the whiteboard). I reminded people that we were able to survive without these new technologies only twenty or twenty five years ago. I also proposed my model of Community Computing as opposed to Personal Computing: I don’t want a computer in every home as this would tend to disrupt family life (based on my own experience); it would be better to have community computing facilities where people went to do what they needed.

Gap or Bridge? The inquirer pointed out that there’s a gap in communication on the Internet in terms of human contact; you need to hug people, have eye-to-eye contact, be together in a place, etc. I said that I see the Internet as a bridge between people who are far from each other. As an exile and migrant I had to maintain relationships with family and friends overseas through the post, the phone, and two-way radio — so I am used to remote relationships. The Internet provides me with better and cheaper tools to maintain such relationships, particularly through videoconferencing. There’s a theory that you need to see someone’s face for full communication to occur — with videoconferencing you are able to see someone’s face and hear them and while this is not the same as flesh-to-flesh encounters, it is a step forward. Nothing will replace face-to-face and flesh-to-flesh encounters but things like videoconferencing are a good alternative in some conditions.

Julia
Screenshot by Mark Tranthim-Fryer

Background

Georgie Davill contacted me on 19 April to ask if I can be on a panel for the Thinktank in case I was in Adelaide around June — I was supposed to attend an Adelaide Festival Artists Committee meeting sometime in June and Georgie was hoping it would be the same time as the Thinktank. I suggested to Georgie that I may not be in Adelaide at all in June-July and maybe she can consider having me as a virtual panelist, something similar to what I did for the “Education and Social Change Conference Online Workshop” in Sydney last year. Georgie asked for more detail on how it can be done and I emailed her some suggestions (specifically using iVisit for videoconferencing).

By 15 June Georgie agreed to doing the video conference. Mark Tranthim-Fryer, who project manages the CCD web site project, also came aboard around this time to help set up the videoconference. Ian Reed came aboard by 21 June; he suggested we use Netmeeting instead as they had successful experiences with it at Open Access College, Marsden, where Ian is a lecturer. I agreed to try out Netmeeting; Ian and I had a test session on Monday, 25 June, at around 10 am. This went very well (transmission-reception wise).

We then had another test session on Wednesday, 27 June, this time with the CAN people at the CAN office. We had the session at 5:30 pm (CST) and the conditions were not as good as the morning session with Ian but still tolerable (especially using text and the whiteboard). Ian reckoned it would be better on Friday morning (mornings are better, net traffic wise, we reckoned) but suggested I have my mobile with hands-free kit ready in case we needed to use that as the audio channel.

During the actual Thinktank session, conditions were better than the Wednesday test session but not as good as the morning session with Ian. I think Ian was on a better connection at his work place (maybe ISDN) and this may explain better response times. CAN was on, I believe, on a dial up phone connection like I was so the delay between transmissions was longer. Other than this problem, we had good conditions — I could see and hear them clearly enough and they could see and hear me well too — no reports of choppy or garbled audio.

I prepared a Flash movie for the text of my presentation, as well as a Powerpoint presentation as a backup in case there was a problem with the Flashmovie. I like the Flash movie because it was the first presentation I did using it, so it was a training/learning exercise for me. I had a Bach cello piece as a soundtrack (in MP3 format) which I liked and also the text snippets faded in and out. Unfortunately, I chose a blue tint for the text and it didn’t turn out that well on the video projector in Adelaide according to Mark who ran tests on it. So we had to use the Powerpoint. I gave Mark the URL for the Flash movie (http://www.octa4.net.au/bramilo/thinktank.htm) just in case people wanted to see it after the session.Mark said (in an email after the session) that it worked well and that there was good feedback and dialogue after my presentation. He also sent me screen capture images. Last, he suggested we continue discussing possibilities for developing videoconferencing for the CCD web site.

I think Netmeeting is a fine application and, with good connections and broader bandwidth, would be ideal for conferencing. One problem I have with it is that it only works on Windows. I will suggest that the CCD web site also offer iVisit — a free videoconferencing application for Windows and MacOS — as an alternative system. See my notes on using iVisit at Webcasting the Class of 76 and Videochatting the Folks back home.

Ozeculture: Getting it Online

Wednesday, July 4th, 2001

from bramilo.weblogs.com

The Ozeculture: Getting it Online Conference was held at the Sofitel, Melbourne, on 13-14 June 2001. It was hosted by the Commonwealth Department of Communication, Information Technology and the Arts (DCITA). I attended as a Northern Territory Delegate.

Sessions

Papers delivered at the Conference will be published on the Conference web site (http://www.acn.net.au/conference/). Below are brief descriptions of presentations.

13 June, Morning Presentations

Welcome

The Hon. Peter McGauran, Minister for the Arts and the Centenary of Federation, gave the welcome address and launched the Culture and Recreation Portal (http://www.cultureandrecreation.gov.au).

Beyond Borders - the digital challenge.

Jennifer Condon, National Informatics Director, Enterprise Ireland, spoke about a “Silicon Alley” project planned for the centre of Dublin — in the old Guiness Factory — that will house the most advanced information technology and new media enterprises, seeking to capitalise on Ireland’s content industries.

Kim Machan, Director, Multimedia Art Asia Pacific, provided artists’ perspectives on new media, including artists from the Asia-Pacific region. She played a Flash movie made by a Korean artist that questioned notions of interactivity and other supposed requirements for new media. She stressed that the artist should be central.

There’s no business like ebusiness

Gary Brennan, Policy Consultant, NSW Film and Television Office, talked about the “commodification of arts administration”; he showed the database application that several film organisations commonly utilised for project management as an example of this.

Vicky Sowry, Director, Media Resource Centre, and Chair of the Australian Network for Art and Technology, demonstrated members’ online databases as examples of how new technologies assist in arts management.

Brett Leavy, Director, Cyberdreaming, talked about how new media can benefit Indigenous communities and showed some projects of Cyberdreaming as examples.

13 June, Afternoon Discussion Groups

I attended the following discussion groups in the afternoon:

Interactive online music demonstration, by Seb Chan and Peter Mahony. A network “jamming” application was demonstrated at the session. The allows several users to build music tracks in real time by sequencing audio samples. The application has been developed for the Powerhouse Museum in Sydney and will be targeted to secondary schools in NSW. It will be launched in October.

Talent Quest — what’s happening in the computer games industry in Australia, with: John DeMarghetti, CEO of Microforte; Julianne Lawson, Program Manager, Arts Queensland; Adam Lancman, President, Games Developers Association of Australia. The speakers gave an overview of the games industry and identified issues, particularly the different requirements for designing games and the lack of graphic artists in Australia who have those skills. A related issue was that of the trend of importing talent from overseas to fill the local gaps.

Keeping an even keel, by David Walker, producer, Lighthouse on the web. David Walker has been active over the years in deflating hype about the Internet. He still recommends “traditional” business models of starting small and building up from there. He also provided information on consumer behaviour and the characteristics of the Internet that militate against an “arts internet” or “entertainment internet”.

14 June, Morning Presentations

Exposure v Exploitation — intellectual property issues raised by digital technologies.

Liz O’Shea of DCITA gave an overview of the developments in the IP area, particularly what Government and the Department have been doing (e.g. Moral Rights legislation).

Robin Wright, Manager, Copyright and Digital Projects, Swinburne University, talked about changes in managing IP brought about by digital technologies, issues to do with balancing public interest and economic exploitation.

Vanessa Rouse, former Executive Director, Arena Theatre, talked about Arena’s experiences in digitising live performance product and issues to do with royalty management and different rights in theatre production.

Vivien Johnson, Senior Research Council Fellow, ANU, talked about the House of Aboriginality project and about the movement against violations of indigenous rights (intellectual property, as well as cultural).

Delia Browne, Executive Director of Arts Law Centre Australia, talked about the activities and services offered by Arts Law Centre as well as some of the issues to do with IP and digital media, including the lack of industry standards so far for determining fees for use of material.

Homegrown - building local cultural content in the era of the international electronic marketplace

John Rimmer, Chief Executive Officer, National Office for the Information Economy, discussed aspects of “Creative Industries”. He cited cultural issues for creative industries, including new employment models, skills deficits, and branding to the world. He also discussed factors for success in creative industries, including exploiting network effects, linking theory and practice, going beyond high art and low art. Also presented were factors for success in the digital economy, including moving from value-chain to value-network, and questioning if there is indeed a “digital content industry”. He outlined challenges facing creative industries, including the convergence of information, communications and broadband technologies. He then mapped out the way forward, including ways to gain competitive advantage, valuing different capabilities in value networks, developing infrastructure, and government’s role as an intelligent purchaser from creative industries.

Getting to know you - partnerships and relationships

The session was chaired by Cliff Smith, Regional Director, South Asia, Novell Inc, and Councillor, Australian Business Arts Foundation (ABAF). He described the good relationship Novell has built with the arts sector and described the role and benefits of ABAF in forging partnerships between the corporate sector and arts organisations.

Lynne Spender, Director, Australian Interactive Multimedia Industry Association, emphasised that there is a digital content industry (in response to John Rimmer’s assertion that these are only extensions of “root” industries).

Carolyn Guerin, former Director, Projects, Sausage Interactive, discussed experiences of artists working in software companies and emphasised the need for collaboration between artists and technical workers in producing digital content.

Will Berryman, Head of New Media, SBS, outlined SBS’s experiences in adopting new media and forging partnerships with the corporate sector, stressing that benefits from partnerships are not necessarily measured in monetary terms and that partnerships must serve arts/organisations purposes rather than being a way to service corporate needs alone.

14 June, Afternoon Discussion Groups

I attended the following discussion groups in the afternoon:

Two plus two equals five - success stories of collaboration between artists and information technology companies.

Dr. Nigel Helyer, new media artist and member of the New Media Arts Board, Australia Council, talked about his residency with Lake, a high tech company in Sydney specialising in audio equipment and products. He worked on a virtual reality system that was sound-based (three-dimensional sound) using Lake’s facilities, equipment, and working with their engineers. He wrote several patents arising from his residency.

Teresa Crea, Artistic Director, Doppio Parallelo, talked about Doppio’s partnership with Motorola (its Research and Development arm specifically). She described one of Doppio’s contributions to the partnership as being an observer of life and lifestyle (as this is what arts organisations are good at) which would then inform Motorola’s research and development activities.

The new venues - interactive spaces.

John McCormick, Director , Company in Space, talked about and demonstrated their work using digital technologies — specifically video conferencing and an application that animates graphics onscreen in real-time through a body suit that digitises motion and controls the animated characters.

Ross Gibson, Creative Director, Cinemedia’s Australian Centre for the Moving Image (ACMI), described the vision and plans for ACMI and presented historical insights into how the moving image. He also had an intriguing statement about navigation and hypertext: he claimed that 19th century arcades were the original hyperlinks.

David Stonier, Manager, Ticketed Events, Museum of Melbourne, talked about the “immersion cinema” system at the Museum; this system, one of few in the world, provides an interactive cinematic experience where viewers can determine the outcome of the story. The initial offerings at the Museum will be about a sci-fi like movie about journeying into the human body.

14 June, Concluding Session: How well is your website?

The concluding session had Steven Smith of United Focus, Will Berryman of SBS, a nd Kevin Sumption of AMOL putting up some websites — e.g. Australian Ballet, Arts Law Centre — on the screen and giving critiques of these sites.

New Media Samples

The Conference program has new media samples as transition or intermission devices. One sample was the famous Turbulence by John McCormack. There was no discussion about these samples.

New Media Exhibition

The Conference featured an exhibition of 18 new media products — film/computer animation, cd-roms, net art, and VR installations — curated by Cinemedia. The exhibition was in a dedicated space beside the main auditorium; delegates were able to view/use/test the various offerings. One highlight of the exhibition was “The WEDGE”, a “low-cost, walk-in Virtual Reality Theatre” developed at the ANU.

My Highlights

The following are things in the conference that were most memorable or significant for me:

I was inspired and envious of what Enterprise Ireland is planning for its own Silicon Alley. I thought it was admirable for the Irish government to invest millions of pounds in new media to take full advantage of its own as well as the world’s content. I was hoping there would be similar initiatives in Australia soon.

I enjoyed the workshop on Interactive music as I am (or would like to be) mainly a musician. The system demonstrated at the workshop was a beta version but it displayed a good framework for interactive electronic musicmaking. It is not the first such system; Rocketnetwork and Resrocket (a MIDI-version of Rocketnetwork) have virtual studios and facilities for online collaboration among musicians writing tracks (Resrocket may be hosted as part of the Powerhouse system because of its MIDI capabilities).

David Walker’s presentation was a big dose of reality. He emphasised that we will not have an Arts Internet or Entertainment Internet because it is not the nature of the medium (which is a “lean-forward, do things” medium rather than a “lie back, consume things” medium as television and other mass media are). He cites statistics on consumer behaviour that have been unchanged over several years: the Net is used mainly for email and searching for and getting information — this trend, he believes is not about to change. Walker also cited a study that there is no direct relationship between spending on IT and productivity; a few of us liked this statement of reality, partly because it reminds us that we were able to survive without much IT in the past and that IT will not solve all our problems.

Critique

I came to the Conference with too many expectations, perhaps, as I came away disappointed.

I thought the Conference promised a lot in terms of a wide range of topics and opportunities to discuss issues. There was indeed a range of topics but the themes of ecommerce and websites dominated and there was not much discussion at all (I felt being talked at for two days as there was not much time for substantial discussion and debate).

The Conference was supposed to be about Ozecuture (Australian e-culture), and getting it online. Most of the presentations had to be with the commercial aspects of cultural issues, and particularly some aspects of ecommerce such as marketing and selling artistic product online, and using online databases for membership management and other administrative purposes. Even assuming that the emphasis on business was justified (and it is not, but more about that later), I thought the conference did not provide an adequate representation of ebusiness. Ecommerce is only one aspect of ebusiness; others are customer relations management, business planning, enterprise management, supply chain management. I had expected discussions about ebusiness to go beyond ecommerce.

I also thought the the emphasis on websites as the main venue for ecommerce or as spaces for arts organisations was a bit narrow. There is more to the Internet, more to online culture than the web. While other online and new media technologies were demonstrated and discussed (particularly in the Exhibition space and in some presentations), I though that beginning the conference with launching a web site and ending it with a session on web sites, and having websites flashed so often within the main program, gave me the impression that web sites are the main vehicle for getting culture online. This is not necessarily true.

The most disappointing aspect, however, was the lack of spaces to discuss Australian culture online, to discuss the creation and development of Australian culture on the Internet — rather than representing the Internet as a repository of “content” and a market place. I would have enjoyed discussing how the Internet can, if at all, be a space to create art, or what the culture (or cultures) are of its cybercitizens (that is, what is the culture of virtual communities, for instance). I felt that the Internet was represented at the conference mainly as just another marketing and commercial vehicle, or a storage and exhibition area for art created in the real world — cyberspace has unique characteristics which determine the creation and development of culture within it, and this was not really discussed at the conference.

Acknowledgment

I attended the Conference with support from:

the Commonwealth Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts for my airfare;

artsNT, the Cultural Development Division of the NT Department of Arts and Museums, for funding my Conference registration and accommodation costs;

Brown’s Mart Community Arts for facilitating and administering support from DCITA and artsNT; and

the Community Cultural Development Board of the Australia Council, for my Fellowship, which covered my wages and other conference-related expenses

Business Arts Partnerships for Cultural Organisations

Wednesday, July 4th, 2001

from bramilo.weblogs.com

I attended a two-day workshop on Developing Business Arts Partnerships for Multicultural Arts Organisations at the Australia Council building in Sydney on 28-29 May 2001. The workshop was hosted by the Policy, Communication and Planning section of Australia Council. I was invited by Cecelia Cmielewski to attend as one of two Northern Territory delegates (the other was Tegan Richardson, Multicultural Arts Officer).

The workshop is part of a program of the Australian Business Arts Foundation (ABAF) that seeks to assist cultural organisations develop partnerships with corporations. The workshop I attended was one adapted for multicultural arts organisations.

A Draft Manual — Developing Business Arts Partnerships: A Guide for the Cultural Sector — was provided to workshop participants. Quotes in this report come from that manual.

The workshop “sets out ways in which cultural organisations and corporations can form individual strategic partnerships through exchanging assets to the benefit of both parties.” The workshop uses and promotes the “Business Case Approach” in building strategic partnerships. It is an approach that is used in the corporate sector as best practice and the workshop seeks to encourage cultural organisations to use it as well.

The business case approach in the workshop is a combination of two approaches, which together form the foundation of the workshop:

* the business case approach, which “involves a strategic exchange between a corporation and a cultural organisation, in which each agrees to provide the other with the kinds of benefits that will assist the other to meet their business needs and achieve their business objectives.”
* the partnership approach “recognises that relationships and arrangements between business and the arts are likely to be most productive and beneficial to both parties when they are reciprocal, strategic, multifaceted, creative and flexible, and long-term.”

The workshop was divided into these major sections:

* The Business Case Approach to Business Arts Partnerships
* Building a Business Case for a Corporate Partnership: Using the Framework
* Researching and Selecting Prospective Good Fit Corporate Partners
* Preparing and Presenting Partnership Proposals
* Negotiating and Confirming Partnership Agreements
* Managing the Partnership Relationship

The workshop consisted of presentations from the workshop facilitator, group discussions, and role-playing toward the end (simulating approaches to corporations for partnership agreements). We were also required to study ten business cases prior to the workshop; these cases were used in the discussion groups and for the role-playing.

Memorable Points

The workshop offered many pointers for and issues with working toward partnerships with corporations. Rather than summarise them all, I will name a few that were more memorable or significant to me.

Cultural organisations are businesses too, although they are often subsidised through arts grants, and as such can and should use the business case and partnership approaches effectively.

Arts organisations are used to being in begging and subservient mode when dealing with the corporate sector. A partnership approach should engender a feeling of dealing with an organisation that can benefit from you as well, thus negating the need to feel inferior to corporations.

Partnerships can mean that assets or benefits exchanged are not necessarily monetary — that is, cultural organisations may not necessarily get funds from corporations, and that corporations do not necessarily get increased revenue out of a partnership. Benefits can be in kind and can be “intangible” (as in enhancing the image of a corporation through partnerships with arts organisations).

Cultural organisations need to be true to their nature and their mission even within a partnership with a corporation. Corporate partners must, for example, understand that a theatre company cannot have the corporate banner in front of the stage, or the logo on costumes, as this arrangement compromises the artistic integrity of the artistic product and the cultural organisation.

The challenge in building partnerships is finding a good fit between a cultural organisation and a corporation. One indicator of a good fit is compatibility of vision and mission, for example when a corporation that wants to enhance its reputation for ecological responsibility partners with an arts organisation involved in ecological concerns.

It costs to maintain partnerships: a senior staff member and a board member (or members) will be required to nurture the relationship. Sometimes the returns are smaller than just going for grants. You must decide if the cost of maintaining partnerships is worth the returns.

Cultural organisations do not have a monopoly on creativity and can’t offer it as a benefit they can exchange for other assets with a corporation. Corporations too have creative talent and can teach cultural organisations a thing or two about creativity.

Corporations are multicultural too and may be sympathetic to multicultural arts organisations offering partnerships.

Issues with the Workshop

While it was made clear that cultural organisations are businesses too, and that there is no need to feel subservient when dealing with corporations, I had a feeling (shared by others at the workshop) that the tendency to approach corporations as senior or superior “partners” (the tendency to kowtow or even to kiss corporate arse) was still strong. This was apparent in the role-playing where the characters playing the corporates seemed to be in a more powerful position and that those playing the cultural organisations always had to adjust to the demands of the corporates.

This may have been just force of habit emerging in the role-playing, but I think this had something to do with how the power relations between corporates and “culturals” was represented during the workshop: the framework was often what cultural organisations had to do to attract partners, so it felt like cultural organisations always needed something more. This may be natural as it was a workshop for cultural organisations; the workshops for corporates (if there are any) may be telling them how to woo cultural organisations, but I doubt that.

Cultural organisations then still appear to be poorer cousins in the relationship as explored during the workshop. I’m not sure why that is exactly but it is worth looking into further.